With over $4 trillion in merger and acquisition transactions happening in 2025, understanding the necessary accounting considerations is essential to see how tax professionals can navigate financial statements.

Defining Bolt-On Acquisitions

This process is often used by private equity companies and occurs when a bigger business acquires a smaller company, providing investors with synergistic performance. This happens because the smaller company gives the bigger company a faster edge through complementary services, products or geographical advantages without having to do research and development from scratch. It also provides the acquiring business with new market access, further increasing the value of an acquisition for the acquiring company.

Bolt-On Versus Tuck-In Acquisitions

Bolt-on companies still have some level of autonomy and keep some of their unique brand identity post-acquisition, despite the acquired assets being integrated into the acquiring company’s overall structure. This contrasts with tuck-in acquisitions, where this type of acquisition completely absorbs the entire assets of the acquired company into the acquiring company.

Defining Asset Acquisition & Accounting Treatment

FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805, Business Combinations, further defines asset acquisitions, including bolt-on acquisitions.

Asset acquisitions are defined as the complete fair value of the acquired assets as defined by similarly identifiable attributes. By meeting the so-called “screen test,” ASC 805 defines it as an asset acquisition. Based upon this type of transaction, acquirers are required to account for it via ASC 805-50’s cost model.

Transaction expenses, including immediately attributable and additive expenses the company sees during the asset acquisition period, are factored into the purchased asset(s) costs. This lowers expenses during the acquisition’s time frame compared to a business combination, which results in greater depreciation expenses over the acquired asset’s life.

Another consideration for asset acquisitions is failing to recognize goodwill. Assets could have a higher basis that’s subject to depreciation or amortization if the value is reported higher than the asset’s fair value. Similarly, when it comes to ASC 842-10-35-3, unless the lease is materially changed, the acquirer must maintain the acquiree’s same lease circumstances.

Defining Business Acquisition

ASC 805 defines a business as a functional combination of assets and processes, featuring novel methods for developing significant input, in order to create new outcomes. This is a subjective process that ASC 805 describes in depth and often requires expertise to make a judgment call. According to ASC 805-10, accounting considerations for business combinations include measuring liabilities and assets at fair value. Legal and consulting transaction costs beginning with the acquisition preparation through the acquisition date should be expensed.

Goodwill is recognized as an asset and evaluated once a year for impairment. Like an asset acquisition, lease classification is kept the same as the acquired company, unless the lease agreement has material alterations.

Conclusion

While there are many different types of acquisition considerations and relevant procedures required, understanding how to navigate bolt-on acquisitions is essential to make the most of accounting for mergers and acquisitions in 2026 and beyond.

Picture two heating-and-cooling companies at opposite ends of the same town. Same revenue, same trucks, same crew. The first one runs on its owner, a guy who spent 20 years building a name, and people call the office because they want him on the roof. The second runs on a brand, a dispatch system, and a phone number folks have had memorized since the ’90s. On paper, the two look like twins. But put them up for sale, and they fetch very different prices – and the reason is goodwill, the chunk of value that has nothing to do with the trucks and everything to do with why the phone keeps ringing.

The Value That Stays

That second company has what valuators call enterprise goodwill. It lives in the business itself: the location people drive past, the name they already trust, the systems that keep running through the two weeks when the founder goes to Cabo. Whoever buys the place inherits all of it, and that is what a buyer pays up for. They are not wagering on one person’s stamina. They are buying an operation that keeps producing after the seller is a memory.

The Value That Walks Out the Door

The first company has personal goodwill, where owners talk themselves into a number the market will not pay. When the clients are loyal to the owner, the referrals come because of the owner, and the day he retires, half the revenue walks out behind him; you cannot deed that over the way you hand across the keys to a van. A business built on one person almost always sells for less, because the buyer is left guessing how much of it actually survives the handoff.

It can be salvaged. A tight employment agreement and a non-compete can keep the seller out of the market long enough for relationships to take root with the new owner. In a lot of these deals, choreographing that single transfer is the whole negotiation.

It Comes Up in Divorce, Too

The same split shows up in divorce, usually not the way people expect. State law varies, but courts tend to treat enterprise goodwill as a divisible marital asset while setting personal goodwill aside, on the logic that it is really the spouse’s future earning power rather than property to carve up. Arizona is one of the states that has swept professional goodwill into the marital estate anyway, in the right case. Wherever it gets heard, someone has to draw that boundary, and a lot of money rides on where the line lands.

Putting a Dollar On It

So how do you put a dollar figure on something this slippery? One of the cleaner tools is the With and Without Method. You build two futures for the company and discount each one back to today. In the first, the key owner stays. In the second, he walks and starts competing down the street. The cash flow that bleeds out of that second version is the value the first one was quietly protecting.

Go back to our first owner and say his presence is worth a formal non-compete. With him locked in, free cash flow runs $10 million a year. With him loose and competing, it slips to $7.5 million. Discount each stream at 7.5 percent over eight years, and the protected version is worth about $58.6 million in today’s dollars against roughly $43.9 million without. That gap, near $14.6 million, is the price tag on the non-compete.

A real engagement would not leave it that clean. I would model how fast the business rebuilds the revenue it lost and weigh the result for how likely the owner is to actually go compete. But the bones of it are exactly that.

What to Take Away

Here is the part worth holding onto. Get this distinction wrong, and you can leave seven figures on the table at a closing or in front of a judge. The line between personal and enterprise goodwill does not draw itself. If you are eyeing an exit, weighing an offer, or fighting over a number in a dispute, get someone to mark it before the other side marks it for you.

When it comes to making an informed investment decision, one way is to use the benefit-cost ratio (BCR).

Benefit-Cost Ratio Defined

The BCR calculates how profitable a project’s (or an asset’s) cash flows are via a present value cash flow analysis. It takes the value of all incoming cash flows and weighs it against the same project’s or asset’s outgoing cash flows. If the calculation results in a BCR higher than 1, then more than likely that asset and/or project will provide a positive outcome.

How the Benefit-Cost Ratio is Calculated

=  ((Moneys received / 1 + discount rate) ^ Cash flow time frames)) / ((Moneys expended / 1 + discount rate) ^ Cash flow time frames))

Money received can also be referred to as the cash flows’ benefits. Money expended is also referred to as cash flow. This formula essentially divides the discounted cash flows by the discounted cash outflows. It’s important to mention that the discount rate can also be referred to as the business’s or investor’s required return.

The following is an example of the different levels of cash flows:

Based on the calculations, the following illustrates the results for both Discounted Costs and Discounted Benefits:

The final calculation sums up the Discounted Benefits and the Discounted Costs and then divides them, resulting in:

$135,612.32 / $59,735.54 = 2.27

Analyzing the Results

The resulting figure means that $2.27 is expected to be generated per $1 invested. It can be used by both internal stakeholders and potential external investors to gauge if the asset or project is worth the risk.

If the BCR came back at less than 1, it would indicate an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) that is lower than the discount rate. This reading would also show that the net present value of the project or asset is projected to be negative.

If the BCR is 1, this essentially means the net pre-set value is zero. The IRR would be equal to the discount rate.

If, however, the BCR is more than 1 – as in the example above – it means the IRR is higher than the discount rate, and the net present value is more than zero.

It’s important to consider that these are only assumptions. If, for example, the cash flow forecasting is incorrect or the discount rate is off, the ratio can provide wide variances.

Conclusion

Whether it’s an internal stakeholder or a potential investor, this ratio can and should be used as part of a holistic financial analysis program.

The Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) measures how much a company spends to obtain new, additional customers. Oftentimes, this calculation is used with the customer lifetime value (LTV) metric, that also projects the customer’s profitability to calculate the newly acquired customer’s value.

It’s primarily used to measure a business’ sales and marketing departments to figure out their profitability, profit margin and return on investment figures.

How to Calculate

CAC = Sales and Marketing Expense / Number of New Customers

Examples of the expenses include product and service promotion expenditures, special compensation and commissions, regular wage payments, and operating expenses.

The tally of newly acquired customers is simply how many new, unique contracts the business acquired. It’s important to keep the expenses and customer acquisition numbers consistent over the same periods.

Why It’s Important

Business owners and their managers, along with investors, can look at sales and marketing efforts from the return on investment of their expenditures and outcomes. For example, there could be multiple channels that sales and marketing took to obtain new customers over a quarter, half-year or 12-month period (such as email marketing, social media marketing, conferences, etc.). Based upon each channel, the customer acquisition cost is determined by dividing the financial outlay per customer acquired.

From there, each channel can be analyzed to see which one works well and, equally important, which ones don’t work well and should either be discontinued or modified. Internal stakeholders and external investors (both existing and potential) can look at trends to see how ongoing efforts may be working and if existing management is productive or needs to be replaced with more competent individuals.

Accounting Considerations

Based on FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification 340-40, businesses are required to document and capitalize incremental costs of securing new customer business if the related expenses are projected to be recouped.

An incremental cost in the scope of obtaining a contract is a cost an entity incurs to obtain a contract that wouldn’t have been incurred if the contract hadn’t been obtained.

While a sales commission (be it fixed or a percentage of a new contract) may be considered an eligible incremental cost to one of its employees, it’s not necessarily always the case. Rather, the true test of whether an incremental cost is capitalizable depends on the subjective interpretation of if a mandated financial expenditure for an incremental cost is attributed to signing a contract with a new customer.

The following sample situations often require more investigation to determine whether the capitalization of costs is applicable:

• Equity issuances based upon meeting production and essential function goals
• Employee compensation according to previous years’ executed contracts
• Sales commissions allocated over multiple timeframes and/or to more than one employee for a single contract

ASC 340-40 also stipulates the amortization schedule of capitalization costs of obtaining a customer contract on a scheduled timeline that follows the delivery to the customer of the contracted goods or services.

Conclusion

While the customer acquisition cost may be straightforward, when it comes to subjective cases, businesses that have experience with murkier situations are able to make the most of their subjective sales and marketing expenses when navigating the tax and accounting landscape. 

Companies that have assets on their balance sheet, but the values of those assets aren’t accurately reflected, are considered to have hidden value. As part of an investor’s fundamental analysis of a potential investment, it looks at a company’s financial statements, the state of the macro economy, and the business’ competitive position relative to its industry. It looks at assets’ book value, reflected on the balance sheet, compared to what the market values it on a fair value or market price. The difference between the balance sheet price and the prevailing market value is what may be hidden.

Defining Hidden Value

Common areas where hidden value may be found include natural resources, real estate, a business’ customer base, and inventory. When investors evaluate a project and conduct accurate analysis between the balance sheet’s book value and the hidden value they believe the market will price it to in the future, investors may take advantage of the increase in value through early investing.

Real Estate

When it comes to real estate, by the way of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), real estate asset purchases are reported at historical cost. However, real estate values oftentimes rise but are not necessarily reflected on the company’s balance sheet. Since the price is reflected on the balance sheet, minus depreciation, if the real estate’s appraisal sells for at or near the appraised price, the difference shows the potential for hidden value.

Asset Considerations

Regardless of the type of asset, and depending on how the items have been cared for, hidden value may exist in the difference between financial statement value and real-world production capability. Assets that are taken care of impeccably, such as machinery, despite following a depreciation schedule, may have actual value above their reported value. Where intellectual property is involved, the amortization schedule may not reflect the full value if the company uses the IP or licenses it for revenue.

Inventory accounting methods, specifically last-in, first-out (LIFO), can impact hidden value considerations. When inflation is elevated, this method denotes the latest costs to the cost of goods sold. More mature inventory at lower costs is kept on the balance sheet for longer periods. This accounting method reduces the assets’ fair value recorded on the final inventory figure, as well as potentially creating tax benefits by lowering the business’ recorded income.

Customer Loyalty

Businesses that have a strong base of loyal customers often own an undervalued asset of customer loyalty. When customers have established a positive relationship with a company, it can make customers more open to new products or services. By opening an easier reception for future growth, the business creates an asset that’s not completely reflected on the balance sheet.

Conclusion

Regardless of the industry or the type of company, implementing effective accounting analysis and recording is one way to maximize one’s tax obligations and maximize asset value to investors and purchasers. Understanding how to do it is the first step in identifying and strategizing current and future financial plans.

Also known as a Senior Note, Senior Debt consists of a company’s outstanding loans collateralized by the business’ assets. As the name implies, Senior Debt holders are the first claimants of the business’ cash flows and/or liquidated assets if that business defaults on its debt and files for bankruptcy. Subordinated or junior debt in the form of Preferred and Common Equity shares has claims to any subsequent assets – but only after Senior Debt holders are made whole. 

Originating via financial institutions, revolving credit facilities, and Senior Term Debt are the primary ways companies obtain financing. Whether the debt is funded by another business, an individual backer, or a traditional bank lender, if the borrowing company files for bankruptcy and liquidates its assets, Senior Bondholders are first in line for available repayment.

Senior Debt Characteristics and Structure

Much like any type of borrowed money, each tier has different interest rates and amortization schedules, including Senior Debt. Senior Debt issuers put terms in the debenture restricting companies from issuing additional, lower-tier debt. Debt issuers often require borrowers to maintain specific credit profiles, which are determined by financing ratios such as interest service coverage and debt service coverage.

Other stipulations may include requiring the borrower to maintain or refrain from business activities beyond their essential commercial functions. If the stipulations are flouted, the lender may retract, modify the borrowing terms, or mandate immediate payment of accrued interest and principal. It’s important to note that since Senior Debt has more restrictive terms, interest rates are generally lower compared to unsecured/less senior debt.

When it comes to unsecured debt, primarily junior or subordinated debt, although it’s not collateralized, the terms stipulate that the lender(s) have a claim to the company’s assets in case of bankruptcy/liquidation and are next in line to get paid off from the assets of the company, minus any pledged assets for secured debt debtholders.

Accounting Considerations

The first step to account for Senior Debt is to break it up into short-term and long-term debt (within 12 months and longer than 12 months). For example, long-term debt, which turns into long-term liabilities from short-term obligations, like accounts payable, is recorded on the company’s balance sheet. This generally happens when the short-term obligations are re-classified into a lengthier note.

If a business obtains a $10 million bank loan, secured by their machinery and other assets, for a new product line, with a 7 percent interest rate for 15 years, along with the business assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity, the long-term portion would be reported on the company’s balance sheet. It would be recorded as a liability on the balance sheet, where any other long-term debt and bonds issued or borrowed by the company.

The income statement would document its loan interest. It’s calculated by taking the principal multiplied by the interest rate.  Once the interest is determined, it’s classified as an expense on the income statement, lowering the company’s net income and profits. As the loan’s principal is paid over the 15-year loan life, a set amount of the loan principal is repaid each year.

Conclusion

Senior Debt can be an effective way to obtain funding, but businesses must understand how funding agreements work and how to properly account for them.

When it comes it understanding a net charge-off (NCO), it’s the difference between any recovery of delinquent debt and gross charge-offs a business sees in a defined accounting time frame. NCOs are debts a company projects with a low likelihood of being collected. It can happen when a customer stops paying outstanding invoices or sees a decline in their credit rating.  

The first step considers it as a gross charge-off; if any amount is recovered, it’s subtracted to arrive at net charge-offs. If businesses can recover a percentage of what’s been charged off, the recovered monies can be net against the gross charge-offs to realize net charge-offs. A business’ loan loss provision is lowered by the net charge-off amount at the end of the accounting time frame and then refilled for the next accounting time frame based on new estimates for loan losses. This is part of a business’ provision for credit losses (PCL) that projects a certain percentage of accounts unable to be collected.

Accounting in Detail

The following formula calculates net charge-offs (NCO). This assumes a gross charge-off booking of 6 percent of all outstanding loans, with 1 percent ultimately being recovered during a particular accounting time frame.

Net Charge-Offs = Gross Charge-Offs – Amount of Recovered Debt

= 6 percent – 1 percent = 5 percent

Once the figure is calculated, the 1 percent collected adjusts the loan loss provision in the accounting statements.

Financial Institutions Illustrate Accounting Considerations

Banks’ business models and financials demonstrate their ability to pay their depositors competitive interest rates while also being able to make loans. Since banks earn profits via net interest margin, earning a spread between what banks pay depositors on interest rates and what borrowers are charged on loans, the spread is integral to measuring profitability. To generate the total value of a bank’s balance sheet, it’s imperative for banks to estimate and project their charge-offs as accurately as possible.

Financial institutions determine credit loss provisions by analyzing their balance sheets and the level of risk represented by outstanding loans. They look at the ratio of loan losses to overall losses, which is their net charge-off rate. The net charge-off rate is used to evaluate a loan’s book quality against other banks.

How Different Risks Impact Net Charge-Off Levels

Banks that have different loan mixes will see different risk and reward payoffs. If one bank offers primarily secured loans, while it may have lower net interest margins, it will also have lower charge-offs because the collateral backing them is less risky overall. This is compared to other lenders that have a higher level of unsecured loans, such as credit cards and commercial loans. This scenario, in the case of riskier loans, may result in higher net interest margins, but also greater potential for higher losses.

Journal Entry Examples

The following journal entries illustrate how to account for bad debts. Using the direct write-off method, when debt collection efforts have been exhausted, bad debts are recorded as follows:

Expenses for bad debt: Debit $750

Accounts Receivable: Credit $750

If, however, the business recovers anything from the customer’s outstanding invoices, the following journal entries would be added if $200 were received:

Cash: Debit $200

Accounts Receivable: Credit $200

Conclusion

While this is primarily for early-stage companies with a low percentage of credit sales, it illustrates how businesses can update their books when projecting their numbers to account for net charge-offs.

According to the May 2019 Financial Stability Report from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, there was more than $15 billion in outstanding commercial credit. While there are many ways companies can obtain funding, additional paid-in-capital (APIC) is one way to accomplish this goal.

Defining APIC

This term refers to the gap between a share’s par value and the distribution price. If an investor pays more than what the company sets for its IPO price offer, that is what determines APIC.

Defining Par Value

Par value is the initial offer price a publicly traded company decides to offer shares to investors during its initial public offering (IPO) on exchanges. Depending on the actual initial price for an IPO, it can be done for publicity reasons, to reduce litigation risks and to aid in improving shareholder return on investment.

Market Value

Based on how well a publicly traded company performs, this is the prevailing price that investors assign to the share price, which varies dynamically.

Determining APIC

Calculating APIC is done as follows:

APIC = (Issue Price – Par Value) x Number of Shares Acquired by Investors

If a company establishes a stock price of $2 per share, investors can decide to bid up each share price to $3 or $7 or $20 via their purchases. If there are 2 million shares outstanding selling for a total of $44 million, the excess of $40 million (beyond the $4 million in par value) is the APIC.

Based on these circumstances, a company’s balance sheet should have the following entries:

– $4 million (paid-in-capital)

– $40 million (additional paid-in-capital)

When accounting for these stock purchases in this scenario, APIC is recorded on the balance sheet under the shareholder equity (SE) section. This can be seen as increasing a company’s bottom line because it results in them receiving additional cash from stockholders.

When it comes to recording the journal entry, the total cash generated by the IPO is recorded as an asset (debit) on the balance sheet, while the common stock and APIC are recorded as equity (credits).

Utility

The utility metric can yield a considerable amount of a business’ share capital, prior to retained earnings starting to accumulate. It helps provide a financial cushion for the company if retained earnings demonstrate a shortfall.

Companies that issue shares permit the business to not increase its fixed costs. Since this method is chosen instead of issuing bonds, there are no interest payments due to buyers of the bonds. Investors are not due any payments, including no dividend obligations. Business assets are also not subject to investor claims. Once shares are issued to investors, the generated funds are non-restricted, so the company can direct the funds as necessary.

APIC lets businesses produce money without any required assets backing the transaction. Depending on the company’s future performance, buying stock at the IPO can generate massive returns.

Further considerations

When there are additional share offerings post IPO, either common or preferred shares, the APIC levels may grow, necessitating them to be documented on the business’s financial statements. If share repurchases are made, levels can be decreased.

While each business has many options to raise money, if a company uses this method, it’s important to ensure that they are accounted for properly. As always, contact a professional to ensure the best personalized advice.

When it comes to business needs, securing financing is a top priority, particularly when starting out or for ongoing needs such as making payroll or paying for inventory. This financing could include a loan or securing an ongoing credit line, and businesses can do that through Off-Balance Sheet Financing (OBSF).

Defining OBSF

Off-Balance Sheet Financing is an accounting practice whereby businesses document liabilities or assets on their books but do not reflect them on their balance sheet. It’s important to note that while they’re not reflected on the business’ balance sheet, if their disclosure meets generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), it’s legal. If select transactions aren’t on the company’s balance sheet, these transactions are generally found in a company’s financial statements via notes. If, however, company employees conceal material information from investors, then it becomes illegal. As the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lay out, financial statements also may contain references to lease expenses, rentals, or partnerships.

Why Companies Use OBSF

Businesses use this type of accounting to manage their debt usage. Along with reducing interest rates for commercial loans, businesses can lower their leverage and debt-to-equity ratios, reducing the chances of default and encouraging outside investment. This is even more advantageous to help companies obtain financing if they have debt covenants.   

In reaction to the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) discovery of operating leases regarding OBSF of more than $1.25 trillion for lease accounting, it changed the requirement for OBSF in February 2016 to mandate U.S. public companies to record “right-of-use assets and liabilities from leases on balance sheets” per 2016-02 ASC 842, coming into force in 2019. Based on the publication “Accounting Standards Update No 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842) p. 1,” footnotes were mandated for greater transparency.

How OBSF Works

OBSF moves select assets, liabilities, or transactions away from their balance sheets. It’s done to attract investors or when a company has a ton of debt yet needs to borrow additional capital to fund operations. This can provide companies with more favorable lending rates. Such transactions are either moved to subsidiaries or via special purpose vehicles. The questionable assets are still there but are simply listed on related monetary documentation.

Depending on how the company proceeds, it can include entities that the parent company has a minority ownership stake in. This may include special purpose vehicles (SPV) that take on assets and liabilities, along with other entities such as joint ventures and research and development (R&D) partnerships.

Conclusion

When it comes to R&D partnerships, since R&D is capital-intensive and requires a long time for completion, OBSF is financially advantageous. It permits a company to reduce its liability over the research time since there are no substantive assets to help even out the liability. Industries such as healthcare can see benefits.

Another advantage of OBSF is that when an operating lease is used, it can create liquidity since capital is not tied up in purchasing equipment, and rental expenses are the only financial outflows.

When done according to GAAP guidelines and state and federal laws, companies that use OBSF can maximize their financial landscape.

When it comes to running a business, having outstanding invoices that turn into uncollectible receivables or simply bad debt is a fact of life. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has a safe harbor that permits businesses to reduce consideration of such bad debt from taxation if it qualifies. However, understanding how to determine if a business is eligible is essential to making the most of it when a business files its taxes.

Defining the Nonaccrual Experience Method (NAE)

When businesses perform a service, they expect to be paid. However, they sometimes have unpaid invoices that are uncollectible. One provision within the IRS’s Internal Revenue Code (IRC) is that of the nonaccrual experience method (NAE) and how it intersects with bad debts.

How It Works      

Once a company sees bad debt in its system after customers fail to pay their invoices, it calculates the amounts it projects it won’t be able to collect. Projecting bad debt is accomplished by the company looking at previous experiences with its payees. It’s important to note that this accounting is used by businesses for only a portion of their projected uncollectable customer bad debt; businesses similarly project the remaining percentage they expect to collect from outstanding invoices in the future.   

One important step for businesses to determine their eligibility for relief from the accrual segment of uncollectible revenue, per the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC), is by determining their industry classification. Sample industries include legal professionals, engineers, performance art professionals, architects, and actuaries.

It’s important to note that if businesses don’t use this method, they may charge off such debts. Charge-offs are when a company writes the debt off its balance sheet and expenses the uncollectible funds on the income statement. Companies must also adhere to the following criteria to take advantage of the safe harbor:

• The company must currently use the accrual method of accounting when recording revenues, and not the cash method to account for revenue.
• The company, in a single year, within the past 36 months, has earned up to, but no more than $5 million in gross receipts.

IRS Guidance

Beginning in September 2011, the Internal Revenue Service permitted taxpayers to use the NAE method to determine applicability by applying a factor of 95 percent to their allowance for bad debts via their past 60 months of financial documents. This permits businesses to exclude qualifying uncollectible revenues from their taxable income, which is beneficial for lowering the amount of taxes owed. It is often easier for NAE-specific designated industries to qualify; however, only companies with the appropriate amount of historical information to substantiate are eligible.

Further Considerations and Conclusion

One example of this safe harbor includes having financial information that’s expertly tracked for the past 60 months via financial statements. If the company can’t substantiate it, they won’t be able to qualify. Similarly, eligible services provided or the resulting receivables that have interest and/or financial penalties attached are ineligible.

When it comes to navigating the IRS code, the NAE can provide another way for eligible companies to maximize filings and tax obligations.